← Today’s ReceiptsSource pending
Public-record receiptR-FLSource pending
C. Franklin disclosed SELL $UPS
Here’s the public record: who traded, what they disclosed, when it happened, how late it appeared, and what context is attached.
Trade range
$50K – $100K
Filed
2025-08-01
Trade date
2025-07-22
Disclosure lag
10 days after trade
Why this receipt matters
A quick read before you share it.
These are factual context points from the receipt and linked public-record data. They explain why the disclosure may be worth opening, not whether anyone acted improperly.
1The disclosure is tracked with source status pending, so treat it as a record to verify rather than a finished source trail.
2The filing appeared 10 days after trade, which helps separate trade timing from filing timing.
3The disclosed range is $50K – $100K, which is the public reporting band rather than an exact profit or loss figure.
413 nearby same-ticker disclosures appeared in the surrounding 30-day window.
5Committee context is available for C. Franklin, but PoliWealth treats it as context - not proof of intent or wrongdoing.
6Related public-record context includes 16 lobbying filings.
Source
source pending
Source: indexed congressional disclosure; official source link pending · filed 2025-08-01 · disclosed 10d after transaction
Market context
United Parcel Service Inc.
Sector: Industrials
Factual flags
- 16 lobbying filings linked to this ticker.
- 13 nearby same-ticker disclosures in the surrounding 30-day window.
- Traded UPS 4d after lobbying filing by UPS (UNITED PARCEL SERVICE) ($1,470,000) (committee overlap: Healthcare)
- Sits on committee with jurisdiction over defense sector — traded UPS on 2025-07-22
- Trade upper bound: $100,000
Member trail
C. Franklin
U.S. House · FL-18
House Committee on ScienceSpaceand TechnologyHouse Committee on Appropriations
Ticker trail
$UPS
United Parcel Service Inc.
Follow this tickerAlert me when this ticker gets a new congressional receipt. This page reports public disclosures and factual context only. It does not determine intent, is not an accusation, and is not investment advice.