← Today’s ReceiptsOfficial public filing linked
Public-record receiptD-OROfficial filing linked
Valerie Hoyle disclosed BUY $AMZN
Here’s the public record: who traded, what they disclosed, when it happened, how late it appeared, and what context is attached.
Trade range
$1K – $15K
Filed
2025-09-12
Trade date
2025-04-02
Disclosure lag
163 days after trade
Why this receipt matters
A quick read before you share it.
These are factual context points from the receipt and linked public-record data. They explain why the disclosure may be worth opening, not whether anyone acted improperly.
1The receipt links to an official public filing, so readers can verify the underlying disclosure before sharing.
2The filing appeared 163 days after the trade date, beyond the standard 45-day STOCK Act window.
3The disclosed range is $1K – $15K, which is the public reporting band rather than an exact profit or loss figure.
435 nearby same-ticker disclosures appeared in the surrounding 30-day window.
5Committee context is available for Valerie Hoyle, but PoliWealth treats it as context - not proof of intent or wrongdoing.
6Related public-record context includes 27 lobbying filings.
Source
Official filing ↗
Source: official House/Senate financial disclosure record · filing ID 20032070 · filed 2025-09-12 · disclosed 163d after transaction
Market context
Amazon.com Inc.
Sector: Consumer Discretionary
Vs SPY: 4.3%
Factual flags
- Filed after the standard 45-day STOCK Act window.
- 27 lobbying filings linked to this ticker.
- 35 nearby same-ticker disclosures in the surrounding 30-day window.
- 6 members traded AMZN within 7 days (starting 2025-04-02)
- 227 trades filed on 2025-09-12 (batch dump)
- Filed 163 days after transaction (STOCK Act limit: 45)
Member trail
Valerie Hoyle
U.S. House · OR-4
House Committee on Natural ResourcesHouse Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Ticker trail
$AMZN
Amazon.com Inc.
Follow this tickerAlert me when this ticker gets a new congressional receipt. This page reports public disclosures and factual context only. It does not determine intent, is not an accusation, and is not investment advice.