← Today’s ReceiptsSource pending
Public-record receiptR-FLSource pending
Ashley Moody disclosed BUY $JPM
Here’s the public record: who traded, what they disclosed, when it happened, how late it appeared, and what context is attached.
Trade range
$15K – $50K
Filed
2025-05-14
Trade date
2025-04-04
Disclosure lag
40 days after trade
Why this receipt matters
A quick read before you share it.
These are factual context points from the receipt and linked public-record data. They explain why the disclosure may be worth opening, not whether anyone acted improperly.
1The disclosure is tracked with source status pending, so treat it as a record to verify rather than a finished source trail.
2The filing appeared 40 days after trade, which helps separate trade timing from filing timing.
3The disclosed range is $15K – $50K, which is the public reporting band rather than an exact profit or loss figure.
419 nearby same-ticker disclosures appeared in the surrounding 30-day window.
5Committee context is available for Ashley Moody, but PoliWealth treats it as context - not proof of intent or wrongdoing.
6Related public-record context includes 28 lobbying filings.
Source
source pending
Source: indexed congressional disclosure; official source link pending · filed 2025-05-14 · disclosed 40d after transaction
Market context
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Sector: Financials
Factual flags
- 28 lobbying filings linked to this ticker.
- 19 nearby same-ticker disclosures in the surrounding 30-day window.
- 4 members traded JPM within 7 days (starting 2025-04-04)
- Traded JPM 17d before lobbying filing by JPMORGAN CHASE HOLDINGS LLC ($940,000)
- 4 trades filed on 2025-05-14 (batch dump)
Member trail
Ashley Moody
U.S. Senate · FL
Senate Committee on Armed ServicesSenate Committee on HealthEducationLaborand PensionsSenate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Ticker trail
$JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Follow this tickerAlert me when this ticker gets a new congressional receipt. This page reports public disclosures and factual context only. It does not determine intent, is not an accusation, and is not investment advice.