IPUBLIC RECORDSEXCHANGERECEIPTSloadinglive·IMONEY TRAILEXCHANGESOURCESverifyinglive·IDATA SOURCESEXCHANGEFILINGSpublic recordslive·IPUBLIC RECORDSEXCHANGERECEIPTSloadinglive·IMONEY TRAILEXCHANGESOURCESverifyinglive·IDATA SOURCESEXCHANGEFILINGSpublic recordslive·
← Today’s Receipts
Public-record receiptD-CAOfficial filing linked

Nancy Pelosi disclosed BUY $AVGO

Here’s the public record: who traded, what they disclosed, when it happened, how late it appeared, and what context is attached.

Trade range
$1.0M – $5.0M
Filed
2025-06-20
Trade date
2025-06-20
Disclosure lag
Same-day filing

Why this receipt matters

A quick read before you share it.

These are factual context points from the receipt and linked public-record data. They explain why the disclosure may be worth opening, not whether anyone acted improperly.

Official public filing linked
1The receipt links to an official public filing, so readers can verify the underlying disclosure before sharing.
2The filing appeared same-day filing, which helps separate trade timing from filing timing.
3The disclosed range is $1.0M – $5.0M, which is the public reporting band rather than an exact profit or loss figure.
432 nearby same-ticker disclosures appeared in the surrounding 30-day window.
5Related public-record context includes 14 lobbying filings.

Source

Official filing ↗
Source: official House/Senate financial disclosure record · filing ID 20030630 · filed 2025-06-20 · disclosed 0d after transaction

Market context

Broadcom Inc.

Sector: Technology

Factual flags

  • 14 lobbying filings linked to this ticker.
  • 32 nearby same-ticker disclosures in the surrounding 30-day window.
  • Trade upper bound: $5,000,000
  • Traded AVGO 27d before lobbying filing by BROADCOM INC. ($80,000)
  • 3 members traded AVGO within 7 days (starting 2025-06-17)

Member trail

Nancy Pelosi

U.S. House · CA-11

Ticker trail

$AVGO

Broadcom Inc.

Follow this ticker

Alert me when this ticker gets a new congressional receipt. This page reports public disclosures and factual context only. It does not determine intent, is not an accusation, and is not investment advice.